Liquorice
Inventory credit for intent and RFQ market makers. Liquorice lets market makers borrow from a shared capital pool just-in-time when they win a solver auction, instead of locking capital across wallets — making intent and RFQ market making more capital-efficient.
7D Momentum
Velocity of growth — engagement quality folded in at 35%
Ranked by a composite of views, reach per follower, likes and bookmarks — normalised against this account's own peak.
- #1
"DeFi needs more liquidity" is one of the most repeated lines in crypto. It's wrong. There is plenty of capital. It's parked where the trading isn't. https://t.co/jOe560ju9v
3211560 - #2
Tokenized stocks, ETFs, and treasuries multiply the stakes. Each new asset class adds demand for liquidity infrastructure, on top of demand for the liquidity itself.
101130 - #3
Billions sit across DeFi doing very little. The capital is locked in isolated venues that can't back each other up. Scattered is not the same as scarce.
001180 - #4
DeFi's ceiling is not set by how much capital shows up. It's set by how hard that capital works. Shared inventory is Liquorice's answer to exactly that problem. https://t.co/rrBwLVI0bx
00070 - #5
A market maker covering three ecosystems keeps three separate piles: one for Venue A, one for B, one for C. When only A is trading, the piles at B and C still sit there, fully reserved and fully useless.
00160
Latest activity from @LiquoriceHQ.
DeFi's ceiling is not set by how much capital shows up. It's set by how hard that capital works. Shared inventory is Liquorice's answer to exactly that problem. https://t.co/rrBwLVI0bx
Tokenized stocks, ETFs, and treasuries multiply the stakes. Each new asset class adds demand for liquidity infrastructure, on top of demand for the liquidity itself.
Shared inventory changes the math. One pool of capital quotes across many execution environments at once, so the pile that used to wait at Venue B now works everywhere. Utilization rises without a single new dollar.
The metric that matters is not TVL. It's how much trading each dollar of TVL can support. Two different leaderboards, and almost everyone tracks the wrong one.
Raising more capital doesn't fix this. It just produces more idle capital, spread across the same broken structure.
Every new exchange, intent protocol, and tokenized asset platform repeats the same demand: fresh inventory, parked here, just for us. The scattering accelerates with every launch.
From outside, that reads as deep liquidity. From inside, it's the same firm reserving capital three times over to run what is essentially one business.
A market maker covering three ecosystems keeps three separate piles: one for Venue A, one for B, one for C. When only A is trading, the piles at B and C still sit there, fully reserved and fully useless.
Billions sit across DeFi doing very little. The capital is locked in isolated venues that can't back each other up. Scattered is not the same as scarce.
"DeFi needs more liquidity" is one of the most repeated lines in crypto. It's wrong. There is plenty of capital. It's parked where the trading isn't. https://t.co/jOe560ju9v